Unrestricted · Full disclosure

Air Publication 118 · Compiler’s Note · July 2026

About this
Publication

This gazetteer was largely written, designed and illustrated by artificial intelligence, and edited, checked and steered throughout by one enthusiast with a laptop. We are not embarrassed about either half of that sentence. Here is exactly how it was done — and how you could do the same for your own obsession.

3
AI systems on charge
1
Human editor
118
Museums surveyed
0
Journalists harmed

Reading brief

Why this page exists

Every publication should say who made it and how. This one was made in an unusual workshop: the prose, the design language and the maps came out of a long conversation with an AI; the pictures came out of another; the whole thing was stitched, corrected and second-guessed by a human editor who takes responsibility for what you read. If something is wrong, blame the editor, not the machinery — that is what editors are for.

COMPILED WITH MACHINE ASSISTANCE · EDITED BY A HUMAN · ERRORS TO THE COMPILER · NO RIVETS WERE COUNTED BY ROBOTS ALONE

Part I · The Machinery

Tools on Charge

What each machine did, and what it did not

The division of labour was straightforward. Claude Fable (Anthropic) wrote the content and built the design — the 1940s Air Publication conceit, the camouflage heroes, the ledger tables, the supplements on the Spitfire and the Vampire, and most of the code behind them, all produced in conversation with the editor. Cursor handled general editing — the day-to-day trimming, fixing and rearranging that any manuscript needs. Gemini Nano Banana (Google) generated the images: the photographic plates, silhouettes and line drawings that fly formation alongside the text.

StationTradeDuties
Claude FableAnthropicContent & design — prose, page architecture, the AP 118 house style, most of the code
CursorAI code editorGeneral editing — revisions, refactors, housekeeping across the manuscript
Gemini Nano BananaGoogleImage generation — plates, artist’s impressions, silhouettes, line drawings
Marcus GreenwoodHumanEditor & compiler — direction, taste, fact-checking, corrections, final say on everything

MachineHumanHOSTING: CLOUDFLARE WORKERS · SURVEY DATA: PUBLIC LISTINGS & VISITOR REPORTS

Intelligence

None of the tools flew solo. Every article was prompted, questioned, re-prompted and edited; the aircraft histories draw on the commonly published figures and were checked against them. AI wrote the first — and often the fifth — draft. A human decided which draft shipped.

Part II · The Compiler

The Editor of Record

Marcus Greenwood — enthusiast first, everything else second

Marcus Greenwood
PLATE A · The compiler, reporting for duty

Marcus Greenwood is a military-aircraft enthusiast who spends an unreasonable amount of his free time in the UK’s brilliant aviation museums — the great national collections and the volunteer-run hangars alike. This site is the logbook of that habit: 118 museums visited or researched, one aircraft compendium, and counting.

The enthusiasm does not stop at the museum gate. At home he builds model aircraft with his son Leo; their combined squadron flies in permanent formation on the wall below. By day he runs UBIO, a web-automation company in London — which explains how the site got built, if not why it got this out of hand.

A wall of hand-built model aircraft hung in formation — bombers, flying boats and fighters seen from above
PLATE B · The home squadron — built by the compiler and his son Leo, hung in flying formation
StationLondon, UK
TradeMilitary-aircraft enthusiast
Day jobCo-founder & CEO, UBIO
Signalsmg@ub.io · LinkedIn

Part III · Full Disclosure

On the Use of Machines

What AI authorship means for what you read here

We see no point pretending otherwise: most of the words on this site were generated by a machine. So was most of the design, and all of the artwork — the plates are labelled “artist’s impressions” because the artist is a model, not a photographer. What the machines did not supply was judgement: which stories to tell, which figures to trust, which jokes to keep, and when the fifth draft was finally the right one. That was human work, and it was most of the work.

The practical consequences for you, the reader: aircraft histories use the commonly accepted published figures, but errors can survive editing here just as they do in print — if you find one, report it to the compiler and it will be corrected with thanks. Museum opening hours, prices and phone numbers are a survey-date snapshot of public listings; verify before travelling. And the photographic plates depict real events but are generated images — treat them as illustrations, never as historical photographs.

Mentioned in dispatches

The rivet-counters. Several readers have already written in with corrections, and every one made the site better. This is the system working as designed.

Appendix · For the aspiring compiler

Build one of these yourself

Whatever your equivalent of aviation museums is — canal locks, fungi, non-league football grounds, lighthouses — you can now build it a home on the web in a weekend, with no more technical skill than the willingness to describe what you want and argue with a machine until you get it. The field guide below is the complete method used to build this site.

The main publication Aviation Gazetteer — all 118 UK aviation museums Return to base →
↑ TOP